“Air Anatomy” – Teaching Complex Spatial Anatomy Using Simple Hand Gestures
Correction(s) for this article
-
Correction to ““Air Anatomy” – Teaching Complex Spatial Anatomy Using Simple Hand Gestures”
- Volume 17Issue 1Anatomical Sciences Education
- pages: 213-213
- First Published online: October 18, 2023
Corresponding Author
Doris George Yohannan
Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Correspondence to: Dr. Doris George Yohannan, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 695011. E-mail: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Funding acquisition (lead), Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Software (equal), Supervision (lead), Validation (supporting), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorAswathy Maria Oommen
Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Data curation (supporting), Formal analysis (equal), Funding acquisition (lead), Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorAmogh Bhaskaran Jayaprasad
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Investigation (supporting), Methodology (lead), Resources (equal), Software (supporting), Validation (lead), Visualization (lead), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorNithin Kadakampallil Raju
Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (equal), Methodology (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (supporting), Visualization (supporting), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorRakesh Omana Suresh
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (equal), Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorSanthanu Jagannath Nair
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Methodology (equal), Resources (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Doris George Yohannan
Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Correspondence to: Dr. Doris George Yohannan, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. 695011. E-mail: [email protected]
Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (lead), Funding acquisition (lead), Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Software (equal), Supervision (lead), Validation (supporting), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorAswathy Maria Oommen
Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (lead), Data curation (supporting), Formal analysis (equal), Funding acquisition (lead), Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (equal), Validation (equal), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (lead)
Search for more papers by this authorAmogh Bhaskaran Jayaprasad
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Investigation (supporting), Methodology (lead), Resources (equal), Software (supporting), Validation (lead), Visualization (lead), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorNithin Kadakampallil Raju
Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (equal), Methodology (equal), Resources (equal), Supervision (supporting), Visualization (supporting), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorRakesh Omana Suresh
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (lead), Formal analysis (equal), Investigation (equal), Methodology (equal), Project administration (equal), Resources (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorSanthanu Jagannath Nair
Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, India
Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Methodology (equal), Resources (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal)
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Spatial understanding of complex anatomical concepts is often a challenge for learners, as well as for educators. It is even more challenging for students with low mental spatial abilities. There are many options to teach spatial relationships, ranging from simple models to high-end three-dimensional (3D) virtual reality tools. Using a randomized controlled trial design, this study explored the use of a unique combination of deictic and iconic hand gestures to enhance spatial anatomical understanding, coining the term “Air Anatomy”. The control group (n = 45) was given a lecture on the anatomy of extraocular muscles, while the intervention group (n = 49) received the same lecture including “Air Anatomy” hand gestures. When compared to the control group, the post-test scores for the intervention group were significantly higher for basic recall (P < 0.001; Mann–Whitney U test) and for the application of knowledge (P = 0.015; Mann–Whitney U test). Students with low to moderate spatial ability (as assessed by a mental rotation test) were found to benefit most by this technique. Students in the intervention group also reported a lower extrinsic cognitive load and higher germane load, when compared to the control group. An instructional skills questionnaire survey indicated the effectiveness of this technique in improving overall classroom experience. Feedback of the students in the intervention group was also favorable for instruction using “Air Anatomy”. The study suggests that “Air Anatomy” is a useful, “no-cost”, accessible method that aids spatial understanding of anatomical concepts.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
ase2088-sup-0001-Supinfo1.pdfPDF document, 294.5 KB | Supplementary Material |
ase2088-sup-0002-Supinfo2.pdfPDF document, 309.3 KB | Supplementary Material |
ase2088-sup-0003-Supinfo3.pdfPDF document, 198.7 KB | Supplementary Material |
ase2088-sup-0004-Supinfo4.pdfPDF document, 89.2 KB | Supplementary Material |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
LITERATURE CITED
- AirAnatomy. 2019a. Air Gross Anatomy playlist. YouTube videos. Yohannan DG, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. URL: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn5ma1hNVo1HHkI-WDJUHAqEWxxLWmYXt [accessed 14th April 2020].
- AirAnatomy. 2019b. Air Embryology playlist. YouTube videos. Yohannan DG, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. URL: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn5ma1hNVo1F2vLTLYbyb1pTMbHKaUt9f [accessed 14th April 2020].
- AirAnatomy. 2019c. Air Histology playlist. YouTube videos. Yohannan DG, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. URL: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn5ma1hNVo1GDzkE1FrVeG-hYPs7TUDS_ [accessed 14th April 2020].
- AirAnatomy. 2019d. Air Neuroanatomy playlist. YouTube videos. Yohannan DG, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. URL: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn5ma1hNVo1H3kD5BKIb2gI_isThBtFbl [accessed 14th April 2020].
- AirAnatomy. 2019e. Air Osteology playlist. YouTube videos. Yohannan DG, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. URL: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLn5ma1hNVo1E07Y6zlXqQguMBJdYLfqOH [accessed 14th April 2020].
- AirAnatomy. 2020a. Eye Movements (Part 1) | Air Anatomy. YouTube video. 15:49 min. Yohannan DG, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHMvYWCCAWU [accessed 20th September 2020].
- AirAnatomy. 2020b. Eye Movements (Part 2) | Air Anatomy. YouTube video. 10; 17 min. Yohannan DG, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jdTEyNIQkg&t=455s [accessed 25th September 2020].
- Anderson RH, Bolender D, Mori S, Tretter JT. 2019. Virtual Reality Perhaps, but Is this Real Cardiac Anatomy? Clin Anat 32: 468.
- Barry DS, Marzouk F, Chulak-Oglu K, Bennett D, Tierney P, O'Keeffe GW. 2016. Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci Educ 9: 90–96.
- Carden SW, Holtzman NS, Strube MJ. 2017. CAHOST: An Excel workbook for facilitating the Johnson-Neyman technique for two-way interactions in multiple regression. Front Psychol 8:1293.
- Castro-Alonso JC, Ayres P, Sweller J. 2019. Instructional visualizations, cognitive load theory, and visuospatial processing. In: JC Castro-Alonso (Editor). Visuospatial Processing for Education in Health and Natural Sciences. 1st Ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland. p 111–143.
10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_5 Google Scholar
- Chan LK. 2010. Pulling my gut out—Simple tools for engaging students in gross anatomy lectures. Anat Sci Educ 3: 148–150.
- Chan LK. 2015. Giving a lecture. In: LK Chan, W Pawlina (Editors). Teaching Anatomy: A Practical Guide. 1st Ed. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. p 61–72.
10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_8 Google Scholar
- Cherdieu M, Palombi O, Gerber S, Troccaz J, Rochet-Capellan A. 2017. Make gestures to learn: Reproducing gestures improves the learning of anatomical knowledge more than just seeing gestures. Front Psychol 8:1689.
- Chimmalgi M. 2019. Interactive lecture in the dissection hall: Transforming passive lecture into a dynamic learning experience. Anat Sci Educ 12: 191–199.
- Cook SW. 2018. Enhancing learning with hand gestures: Potential mechanisms. Psychol Learn Motiv 69: 107–133.
- Cook SW, Yip TK, Goldin-Meadow S. 2012. Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Lang Cognit Process 27: 594–610.
- Cooper AZ, Richards JB. 2017. Lectures for adult learners: Breaking old habits in graduate medical education. Am J Med 130: 376–381.
- Dargue N, Sweller N, Jones MP. 2019. When our hands help us understand: A meta-analysis into the effects of gesture on comprehension. Psychol Bull 145: 765–784.
- Dickson KA, Stephens BW. 2015. It's all in the mime: Actions speak louder than words when teaching the cranial nerves. Anat Sci Educ 8: 584–592.
- Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. 2014. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ 7: 321–325.
- Finn GM, McLachlan JC. 2010. A qualitative study of student responses to body painting. Anat Sci Educ 3: 33–38.
- Fritz CO, Morris PE, Richler JJ. 2012. Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. J Exp Psychol 141: 2–18.
- Garg AX, Norman G, Sperotable L. 2001. How medical students learn spatial anatomy. Lancet 357: 363–364.
- Ginns P, Kydd A. 2020. Learning human physiology by pointing and tracing. In: S Tindall-Ford, S Agostinho, J Sweller (Editors). Advances in Cognitive Load Theory: Rethinking Teaching. 1st Ed. Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge. p 119–129.
- Gogalniceanu P, Madani H, Paraskeva PA, Darzi A. 2008. A minimally invasive approach to undergraduate anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ 1: 46–47.
- Goldin-Meadow S, Nusbaum H, Kelly SD, Wagner S. 2001. Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychol Sci 12: 516–522.
- Goodrich W, Hudson Kam CL. 2009. Co-speech gesture as input in verb learning. Dev Sci 12: 81–87.
- Guillot A, Champely S, Batier C, Thiriet P, Collet C. 2007. Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 12: 491–507.
- Gukas DI. 2007. Global paradigm shift in medical education: Issues of concern for Africa. Med Teach 29: 887–892.
- Hale AJ, Freed J, Ricotta D, Farris G, Smith CC. 2017. Twelve tips for effective body language for medical educators. Med Teach 39: 914–919.
- Hall S, Stephens J, Parton W, Myers M, Harrison C, Elmansouri A, Lowry A, Border S. 2018. Identifying medical student perceptions on the difficulty of learning different topics of the undergraduate anatomy curriculum. Med Sci Educ 28: 469–472.
10.1007/s40670-018-0572-z Google Scholar
- Hayes AF. 2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. 2nd Ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. 692 p.
- Hayes AF. 2020. The PROCESS macro for SPSS, SAS, and R. Andrew F. Hayes, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. URL: https://www.processmacro.org/index.html [accessed 14 July 2020].
- Höffler TN, Leutner D. 2011. The role of spatial ability in learning from instructional animations–Evidence for an ability-as-compensator hypothesis. Comput Hum Behav 27: 209–216.
- Hortsch M. 2015. “How we learn may not always be good for us” – Do new electronic teaching approaches always result in better learning outcomes? Med Teach 37: 507–509.
- Hostetter AB. 2011. When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 137: 297–315.
- Hostetter AB, Alibali MW. 2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bull Rev 15: 495–514.
- Hovey RB, Rodríguez C, Jordan S. 2020. Beyond lecturing: An introduction to Gadamer's dialogical hermeneutics with insights into health professions education. Health Prof Educ 6: e465–e471.
10.1016/j.hpe.2020.08.004 Google Scholar
- ICMR. 2017. Indian Council of Medical Research. National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants. 1st Ed. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Medical Research. 187 p. URL: https://ethics.ncdirindia.org//asset/pdf/ICMR_National_Ethical_Guidelines.pdf [accessed 13 April 2020].
- Jaffar AA. 2012. YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 5: 158–164.
- Jang S, Vitale JM, Jyung RW, Black JB. 2017. Direct manipulation is better than passive viewing for learning anatomy in a three-dimensional virtual reality environment. Comput Educ 106: 150–165.
- Kelly SD, Manning SM, Rodak S. 2008. Gesture gives a hand to language and learning: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology and education. Lang Ling Compass 2: 569–588.
10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00067.x Google Scholar
- Kemp AT, Preston J, Page CS, Harper R, Dillard B, Flynn J, Yamaguchi M. 2014. Technology and teaching: A conversation among faculty regarding the pros and cons of technology. Qual Rep 19: 6.
- Knol MH, Dolan CV, Mellenbergh GJ, van der Maas HL. 2016. Measuring the quality of university lectures: Development and validation of the instructional skills questionnaire (ISQ). PLoS One 11:e0149163.
- Korbach A, Ginns P, Brünken R, Park B. 2020. Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. J Comput Assist Learn 36: 102–113.
- Koschmann T, LeBaron C, Goodwin C, Zemel A, Dunnington G. 2007. Formulating the triangle of doom. Gesture 7: 97–118.
10.1075/gest.7.1.06kos Google Scholar
- Kruzik N. 2009. Benefits of preoperative education for adult elective surgery patients. AORN J 90: 381–387.
- Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y. 2016. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ 9: 411–421.
- KUHS. 2018. Kerala University of Health Sciences. Syllabus for Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery. 1st Ed. Thrissur, Kerala, India: Kerala University of Health Sciences. 233 p. URL: http://14.139.185.154/kuhs_new/images/uploads/pdf/academic/courses-syllabus/medicine/New_MBBS_16-05-2018.pdf [accessed 3rd November 2020].
- Lam TP, Lam YYB. 2009. Medical education reform: The Asian experience. Acad Med 84: 1313–1317.
- Langlois J, Bellemare C, Toulouse J, Wells GA. 2017. Spatial abilities and anatomy knowledge assessment: A systematic review. Anat Sci Educ 10: 235–241.
- Leppink J, Paas F, Van der Vleuten CP, Van Gog T, Van Merriënboer JJ. 2013. Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behav Res Methods 45: 1058–1072.
- Lucas P, Lenstrup M, Prinz J, Williamson D, Yip H, Tipoe G. 1997. Language as a barrier to the acquisition of anatomical knowledge. Med Educ 31: 81–86.
- Macken L, Ginns P. 2014. Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Med Teach 36: 596–601.
- Mayer RE. 2014. Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In: RE Mayer (Editor). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. 2nd Ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 43–71.
10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005 Google Scholar
- MCI. 2018. Medical Council of India. Competency Based Undergraduate Curriculum for the Indian Medical Graduate. 1st Ed. New Delhi, India: Medical Council of India. 257 p. URL: https://www.nmc.org.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/UG-Curriculum-Vol-I.pdf [accessed 3rd November 2020].
- McMenamin PG, Quayle MR, McHenry CR, Adams JW. 2014. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 7: 479–486.
- McNeill D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. 1st Ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 416 p.
- Mori S, Tretter JT, Spicer DE, Bolender DL, Anderson RH. 2019. What is the real cardiac anatomy? Clin Anat 32: 288–309.
- Moro C, Štromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. 2017. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 10: 549–559.
- Nguyen N, Mulla A, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD. 2014. Visuospatial anatomy comprehension: The role of spatial visualization ability and problem-solving strategies. Anat Sci Educ 7: 280–288.
- Novack M, Goldin-Meadow S. 2015. Learning from gesture: How our hands change our minds. Educ Psychol Rev 27: 405–412.
- Ogunkola B, Knight C. 2018. Does technical drawing increase students' mental rotation ability? Cogent Educ 5:1489209.
- Oh CS, Kim JY, Choe YH. 2009. Learning of cross-sectional anatomy using clay models. Anat Sci Educ 2: 156–159.
- Oh CS, Won HS, Kim KJ, Jang DS. 2011. “Digit anatomy”: A new technique for learning anatomy using motor memory. Anat Sci Educ 4: 132–141.
- Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. 2014. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: A case for medical imaging and vertical integration. Anat Sci Educ 7: 251–261.
- Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J. 2003. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educ Psychol 38: 1–4.
- Paas F, Sweller J. 2012. An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educ Psychol Rev 24: 27–45.
- Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C. 1995. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test - Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cognit 28: 39–58.
- Ping R, Goldin-Meadow S. 2010. Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognit Sci 34: 602–619.
- Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R. 2013. "Let's get physical": Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 6: 216–224.
- Ravi KS. 2020. Dead body management in times of Covid-19 and its potential impact on the availability of cadavers for medical education in India. Anat Sci Educ 13: 316–317.
- Reid S, Shapiro L, Louw G. 2019. How haptics and drawing enhance the learning of anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 12: 164–172.
- Rochford K. 1985. Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students. Med Educ 19: 13–26.
- Rosse C, Gaddum-Rosse P. 1997. Hollinshead's Textbook of Anatomy. 5th Ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers. 912 p.
- Samarasekera DD, Gopalakrishnakone P, Gwee MC. 2015. Assessing anatomy as a basic medical science. In: LK Chan, W Pawlina (Editors). Teaching Anatomy. 1st Ed. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. p 279–289.
10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_31 Google Scholar
- Skinder-Meredith AE. 2010. Innovative activities for teaching anatomy of speech production. Anat Sci Educ 3: 234–243.
- Stieff M, Lira ME, Scopelitis SA. 2016. Gesture supports spatial thinking in STEM. Cognit Instr 34: 80–99.
- Streeck J. 2009. Gesturecraft: The manufacture of meaning. 1st Ed. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 235 p.
- Sweller J, Sweller S. 2006. Natural information processing systems. Evol Psychol 4: 434–458.
10.1177/147470490600400135 Google Scholar
- Vekiri I. 2002. What is the value of graphical displays in learning? Educ Psychol Rev 14: 261–312.
- Wang J, Antonenko P, Dawson K. 2020. Does visual attention to the instructor in online video affect learning and learner perceptions? An eye-tracking analysis. Comput Educ 146:103779.
- Yeager VL. 1996. Learning gross anatomy: Dissection and prosection. Clin Anat 9: 57–59.
- Yohannan DG, Oommen AM, Umesan KG, Raveendran VL, Sreedhar LSL, Anish TS, Hortsch M, Krishnapillai R. 2019. Overcoming barriers in a traditional medical education system by the stepwise, evidence-based introduction of a modern learning technology. Med Sci Educ 29: 803–817.
- Zureick AH, Burk-Rafel J, Purkiss JA, Hortsch M. 2018. The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376.