Perceptions, satisfactions, and performance of undergraduate students during Covid-19 emergency remote teaching
Jessica Wilhelm
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSpencer Mattingly
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Victor H. Gonzalez
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Undergraduate Biology Program, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Correspondence
Dr. Victor H. Gonzalez, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Haworth Hall, 1200 Sunnyside Ave., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJessica Wilhelm
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSpencer Mattingly
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Victor H. Gonzalez
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Undergraduate Biology Program, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Correspondence
Dr. Victor H. Gonzalez, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Haworth Hall, 1200 Sunnyside Ave., University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, the education system worldwide faced sudden and unforeseen challenges. Many academic institutions closed their doors, forcing both educators and students to transition to Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT) for the remainder of the semester. This transition eliminated hands-on experiences, increased workload, and altered curricula. However, these aspects, as well as students' perceptions, study habits, and performance in response to ERT remain poorly documented. This contribution describes changes in the curriculum of an undergraduate cadaver-based laboratory, and explores students' performance, self-perceived learning, and overall satisfaction during this educational crisis. Online content delivery for this course included both asynchronous instruction and synchronous discussion sessions. While formative assessments remained the same, online spotter examinations included short answer, multiple choice, multiple answer, ordering, and true and false questions. Despite examination grades improving 20% during ERT, students reported lower levels of learning, confidence, and engagement with the course materials when compared to the face-to-face portion of the class. The most prevalent challenges identified by students were those related to the loss of access to cadaver-based learning, including difficulty identifying and visualizing structures in three dimensions, and the loss of context and sensorial cues. Flexibility in taking examinations and learning the material at their own pace were recognized as positive outcomes of the ERT transition. While the resulting student perceptions and performances are unsurprising, they offer insight into the challenges of fostering a productive learning environment in a future threatened by epidemic outbreak and economic uncertainty.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
ase2161-sup-0001-Appendix.docxWord 2007 document , 4.7 MB | Supplementary Material |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Adamu LH, Yusuf AH, Taura MG. 2018. Differences in multiple choice and short answer question performance among medical and dental trainees as reflected in their anatomy course. J Contemp Med Educ 6: 7–16.
10.5455/jcme.20170706060134 Google Scholar
- Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H. 2020. COVID-19 and medical education. Lancet Infect Dis 20: 777–778.
- Attardi S, Choi S, Barnett J, Rogers K. 2016. Mixed methods student evaluation of an online systemic human anatomy course with laboratory. Anat Sci Educ 9: 272–285.
- Azer SA, Eizenberg N. 2007. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem based learning medical course? Perceptions of first and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat 29: 173–180.
- Balkhi F, Nasir A, Zehra A, Riaz R. 2020. Psychological and behavioral response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Cureus 12:e7923.
- Bamber A, Quince T, Barclay S, Clark J, Siklos P, Wood D. 2014. Medical student attitudes to the autopsy and its utility in medical education: A brief qualitative study at one UK medical school. Anat Sci Educ 7: 87–96.
- Banovac I, Katavić V, Blažević A, Bičanić I, Hladnik A, Kovačić N, Petanjek Z. 2021. The anatomy lesson of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Irreplaceable tradition (cadaver work) and new didactics of digital technology. Croa Med J 62: 173–186.
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67: 1–48.
- Borgatti SP. 1996. Anthropac software, version 4.97. Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KY.
- Bond G, Franchi T. 2020. Resuming cadaver dissection during a pandemic. Med Educ Online 26:1842661.
- Burgess S, Sievertsen HH. 2020. Schools, skills, and learning: The impact of COVID-19 on education. VoxEU- CEPR's Policy Portal, 01 April 2020. The Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, UK. URL: https://voxeu.org/article/impact-COVID-19-education [accessed 21 May 2020].
- Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Mächler M, Bolker BM. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9: 378–400.
- Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, Zheng J. 2020. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res 287:112934.
- Cheng X, Chan LK, Pan SQ, Cai H, Li YQ, Yang X. 2021. Gross anatomy education in China during the Covid-19 pandemic: A national survey. Anat Sci Educ 14: 8–18.
- Cuschieri S, Calleja Agius J. 2020. Spotlight on the shift to remote anatomical teaching during Covid-19 pandemic: Perspectives and experiences from the University of Malta. Anat Sci Educ 13: 671–679.
- Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM. 2014. Human anatomy: Let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ 7: 262–272.
- Durosaro O, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2008. Use of knowledge-sharing web-based portal in gross and microscopic anatomy. Ann Acad Med Singap 37: 998–1001.
- Ellis H. 2001. Teaching in the dissecting room. Clin Anat 14: 149–151.
- Estai M, Bunt S. 2016. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat 208: 151–157.
- Evans DJ, Bay BH, Wilson TD, Smith CF, Lachman N, Pawlina W. 2020. Going virtual to support anatomy education: A STOPGAP in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ 13: 279–283.
- Evans DJ, Cuffe T. 2009. Near peer teaching in anatomy: An approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ 2: 227–233.
- Evans DJ, Pawlina W, Lachman N. 2018. Human skills for human[istic] anatomy: An emphasis on nontraditional discipline-independent skills. Anat Sci Educ 11: 221–224.
- Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Cureus 12:e7492.
- Fox J, Weisberg S. 2019. An R Companion to Applied Regression. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. 608 p.
- Franchi T. 2020. The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on current anatomy education and future careers: A student's perspective. Anat Sci Educ 13: 312–315.
- Garbarski D, Schaeffer NC, Dykema J. 2015. The effects of response option order and question order on self-rated health. Qual Life Res 24: 1443–1453.
- Gewin V. 2020. Five tips for moving teaching online as COVID-19 takes hold. Nature 580: 295–296.
- Gonzalez T, de la Rubia MA, Hincz KP, Comas-Lopez M, Subirats L, Fort S, Sacha GM. 2020. Influence of Covid-19 confinement in students' performance in higher education. PLoS One 15:e0239490.
- Green R, Farchione D, Hughes D, Chan S. 2014. Participation in asynchronous online discussion forums does improve student learning of gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 7: 71–76.
- Green R, Hughes D. 2013. Student outcomes associated with use of asynchronous online discussion forums in gross anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ 6: 101–106.
- Gupta N, Pandey S. 2020. Disruption of anatomy dissection practical in COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges, problems and solutions. J Lumbini Med Coll 8: 350.
- Harmon DJ, Attardi SM, Barremkala M, Bentley DC, Brown KM, Dennis JF, Goldman HM, Harrell KM, Klein BA, Ramnanan CJ, Richtsmeier JT, Farkas GJ. 2021. An analysis of anatomy education before and during Covid-19: May–August 2020. Anat Sci Educ 14: 132–147.
- He N. 2021. Rapid evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic calls for a unified public health response. Biosci Trends 15: 196–200.
- Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. 2020. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27 March 2020. EDUCAUSE, Washington, DC. URL: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning [accessed 1 May 2020].
- Iglesias-Pradas S, Hernández-García A, Chaparro-Peláez J, Prieto JL. 2021. Emergency remote teaching and students' academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Comput Hum Behav 119:106713.
- Inuwa IM, Al-Rawahy M, Tanikanti V, Habbal O. 2011. Anatomy “steeplachase” online: Necessity sometimes is the catalyst for innovation. Anat Sci Educ 4: 115–118.
- Inuwa IM, Tanikanti V, Al-Rawahy M, Habbal O. 2012. Anatomy practical examinations: How does student performance of computerized evaluation compare with the traditional format? Anat Sci Educ 5: 27–32.
- Iyer P, Aziz K, Ojcius DM. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on dental education in the United States. J Dent Educ 84: 718–722.
- Jaffar A. 2012. YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 5: 158–164.
- Karunakaran I, Thirumalaikolundusubramanian P, Nalinakumari S. 2017. A preliminary survey of professionalism teaching practices in anatomy education among Indian medical colleges. Anat Sci Educ 10: 433–443.
- Kerby J, Shukur ZN, Shalhoub J. 2011. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clin Anat 24: 489–497.
- Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman G, Wainman B. 2013. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 6: 211–215.
- Kim JW, Myung SJ, Yoon HB, Moon SH, Ryu H, Yim JJ. 2020. How medical education survives and evolves during Covid-19: Our experiences and future direction. PLoS One 15:e0243958.
- Kuckartz U. 2019. Qualitative text analysis: A systematic approach. In: G Kaiser, N Presmeg (Editors). Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education. 1st Ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Open. p 181–197.
10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_8 Google Scholar
- Kumar Ghosh S, Kumar A. 2019. Building professionalism in human dissection room as a component of hidden curriculum delivery: A systematic review of good practice. Anat Sci Educ 12: 210–221.
- Lemos GA, Araújo DN, de Lima FJ, Bispo RF. 2021. Human anatomy education and management of anatomic specimens during and after COVID-19 pandemic: Ethical, legal and biosafety aspects. Ann Anat 233:151608.
- Lenth RV. 2016. Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw 69: 1–33.
- Lewis SE. 2020. Chemistry assessments through the sudden implementation of online instruction. J Chem Educ 97: 3418–3422.
- Li Y, Wang Y, Jiang J, Valdimarsdóttir U, Fall K, Fang F, Song H, Lu D, Zhang W. 2020. Psychological distress among health professional students during the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychol Med 2020: 1–3.
- Longhurst GJ, Stone DM, Dulohery K, Scully D, Campbell T, Smith CF. 2020. Strength, weakness, opportunity, threat (SWOT) analysis of the adaptations to anatomical education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in response to the Covid-19 Pandemic. Anat Sci Educ 13: 298–308.
- Malhotra N. 2008. Completion time and response order effects in web surveys. Pub Opin Q 72: 914–934.
- Mathiowetz V, Yu C, Quake-Rapp C. 2016. Comparison of a gross anatomy laboratory to online anatomy software for teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 9: 52–59.
- Mattingly S, Hardesty E, Chovanec K, Cobos ME, Garcia J, Grizzle M, Huerta A, Ohtake J, Romero-Alvarez D, Gonzalez VH. 2021. Differences between attached and detached cadaveric prosections on students' identification ability during practical examinations. Anat Sci Educ 14: 808–815.
- Mejia C. 2020. Using voicethread as a discussion platform to enhance student engagement in a hospitality management online course. J Hospit Leisure Sport Tourism Educ 26:100236.
- McFarland SG. 1981. Effects of question order on survey responses. Pub Opin Q 45: 208–215.
- McNulty JA, Sonntag B, Sinacore JM. 2009. Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: A six-year study. Anat Sci Educ 2: 2–8.
- Mohan BS, Nambiar V. 2020. COVID-19: An insight into SARS-CoV-2 pandemic originated at Wuhan City in Hubei Province of China. J Infect Dis Epidemiol 6: 146.
10.23937/2474-3658/1510146 Google Scholar
- Mujeeb AM, Pardeshi ML, Ghongane BB. 2010. Comparative assessment of multiple choice questions versus short essay questions in pharmacology examinations. Ind J Med Sci 64: 118–124.
- Noreen K, Rubab ZE, Umar M, Rehman R, Baig M, Baig F. 2020. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices against the growing threat of COVID-19 among medical students of Pakistan. PLoS One 15:e0243696.
- Ogard WK. 2014. Outcomes related to a multimodal human anatomy course with decreased cadaver dissection in a doctor of physical therapy curriculum. J Phys Ther Educ 28: 21–26.
10.1097/00001416-201407000-00004 Google Scholar
- Pacheco LF, Noll M, Rodrigues C. 2020. Challenges in Teaching human anatomy to students with intellectual disabilities during the Covid-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ 13: 556–557.
- Poston J, Apostel S, Richardson K. 2020. Using Microsoft Teams to enhance engagement and learning with any class: It's fun and easy. In: Proceedings of the Pedagogicon Conference: Transparency in Teaching & Learning; Richmond, KY, 2019 May 16-17. Paper #6. Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY. URL: https://encompass.eku.edu/pedagogicon/2019/guidinggrading/6 [accessed 10 November 2021].
- Ooi SZ, Ooi R. 2020. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic on the future of cadaveric dissection anatomical teaching. Med Educ Online 25:1823089.
- Patel KM, Moxham BJ. 2006. Attitudes of professional anatomists to curricular change. Clin Anat 19: 132–141.
- Pather N, Blyth P, Chapman JA, Dayal MR, Flack NA, Fogg QA, Green RA, Hulme AK, Johnson IP, Meyer AJ, Morley JW, Shortland PJ, Štrkalj G, Štrkalj M, Valter K, Webb AL, Woodley SJ, Lazarus MD. 2020. Forced disruption of anatomy education in Australia and New Zealand: An acute response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ 13: 284–300.
- Pepple DJ, Young LE, Carroll RG. 2010. A comparison of student performance in multiple-choice and long essay questions in the MBBS state I physiology examination at the University of the West Indies (Mona Campus). Adv Physiol Educ 34: 86–89.
- Petersson H, Sinkvist D, Wang C, Smedby Ö. 2009. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anat Sci Educ 2: 61–68.
- Preece D, Williams S, Lam R, Weller R. 2013. “Let's get physical”: Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 6: 216–224.
- Roberto KJ, Johnson AF, Rauhaus BM. 2020. Stigmatization and prejudice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adm Theory Prax 42: 364–378.
10.1080/10841806.2020.1782128 Google Scholar
- Ravi KS. 2020. Dead body management in times of Covid-19 and its potential impact on the availability of cadavers for medical education in India. Anat Sci Educ 13: 316–317.
- Rizzolo L, Rando W, O'Brien M, Haims A, Abrahams J, Stewart W. 2010. Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Innovative Anatomy Course. Anat Sci Educ 3: 109–120.
- Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB. 2006. Should we continue teaching anatomy by dissection when …? Anat Rec 289B: 215–218.
10.1002/ar.b.20117 Google Scholar
- Rose S. 2020. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA 323: 2131–2132.
- Saltarelli AJ, Roseth CJ, Saltarelli WA. 2014. Human cadavers vs. multimedia simulation: A study of student learning in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 7: 331–339.
- Sándor I, Birkás E, Győrffy Z. 2015. The effects of dissection-room experiences and related coping strategies among Hungarian medical students. BMC Med Educ 15: 73.
- Schneider R, Hankin M, Morse D, Bennett C. 2011. Anatomy & Physiology Revealed 3.0: An Interactive Cadaver Dissection Experience. DVD-ROM. The University of Toledo/McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math, New York, NY.
- Simonson M, Zvacek SM, Smaldino S. 2019. Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education. 7th Ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc. 366 p.
- Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P. 2020. Cadaverless anatomy: Darkness in the times of pandemic Covid-19. Morphologie 104: 147–150.
- Singh A, Karayev S, Gutowski K, Abbeel P. 2017. Gradescope: A fast, flexible, and fair system for scalable assessment of handwritten work. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S 2017); Cambridge, MA, 2017 April, 81–88. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.
10.1145/3051457.3051466 Google Scholar
- Soled D, Goel S, Barry D, Erfani P, Joseph N, Kochis M, Uppal N, Velasquez D, Vora K, Scott KW. 2020. Medical student mobilization during a crisis: Lessons from a COVID-19 medical student response team. Acad Med 95: 1384–1387.
- Sparacino AM, Gonzalez VH, Ball S, Cielocha JJ, Helm K, McLeod DS. 2018. A quantitative analysis of four undergraduate human anatomy laboratory curricula: Approaches, identified structures, concepts, and thematic emphases. Med Sci Educ 29: 101–111.
- Srinivasan DK. 2020. Medical students' perceptions and an anatomy teacher's personal experience using an e-learning platform for tutorials during the Covid-19 crisis. Anat Sci Educ 13: 318–319.
- Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. 2010. The anatomy of anatomy: A review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 3: 83–93.
- Tam MD, Hart AR, Williams SM, Holland R, Heylings D, Leinster S. 2010. Evaluation of a computer program (‘disect’) to consolidate anatomy knowledge: A randomised-controlled trial. Med Teach 32: e138–e142.
- Topping DB. 2014. Gross anatomy videos: Student satisfaction, usage, and effect on student performance in a condensed curriculum. Anat Sci Educ 7: 273–279.
- Trelease RB. 2002. Anatomical informatics: Millennial perspectives on a newer frontier. Anat Rec 269: 224–235.
- Trelease RB. 2016. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ 9: 583–602.
- UNESCO. 2020. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. COVID-19 educational disruption and response. UNESCO, Paris, France. URL: https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-emergencies/coronavirusschool-closures [accessed 20 May 2020].
- Vogel S, Schwabe L. 2016. Learning and memory under stress: Implications for the classroom. NPJ Sci Learn 1:10611.
10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11 Google Scholar
- WHO. 2020. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Situation report - 72. 1st Ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. 13 p. URL: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200401-sitrep-72-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=3dd8971b_2 [accessed 20 May 2020].
- Wright SJ. 2012. Student perceptions of an upper-level, undergraduate human anatomy laboratory course without cadavers. Anat Sci Educ 5: 146–157.
- Yoo H, Kim D, Lee Y, Rhyu I. 2021. Adaptations in anatomy education during COVID-19. J Kor Med Sci 36:E13.
- Zhai Y, Du X. 2020a. Addressing collegiate mental health amid COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Res 288:113003.
- Zhai Y, Du X. 2020b. Mental health care for international Chinese students affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry 7:e22.